Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Torts Tips!
So – how to succeed on your exam? I’ve decided, in the Thanksgiving spirit, to compile some Torts Tips, and then you guys can be thankful when exams are done!
1) Issue Spotting: for many, the tricky part of torts is issue spotting. Remember that most facts are in the hypo for a reason, so what I do to spot issues is line up important facts on one side, and then on the other side, write the tort. This way, you know you are not missing anything. Also, if you forget a tort, and this will happen, you don’t just disregard the facts. For instance, you see that Bob punched Jim, so you write that down in one column, but then you forget that hitting is usually battery. This way, you can at least mention that Bob punching Jim is a tort, even if you can’t articulate that it’s batter. You won’t get the full amount of points, but you will get some credit for knowing that the facts are important.
2) Intent v Negligence: An intentional tort can not be done negligently. Negligence can not have intent. There are no exceptions. Negligence is always an accident, that’s why we call it negligence. If there is any intent, it is an intentional tort.
3) Vicarious Liability. It is very important to understand this concept, so important that I wrote an entire article on it! Go here http://thebarexamdossier.blogspot.com/2009/10/vicarious-liability-what-it-is-what-it.html
4) Torts before defenses. Think of your exam like going into court; you have to first establish the prima facie claim before bringing up any defense. So many people want to just state “Bob did not commit battery because there was self defense…”. You have to FIRST establish there was a battery, THEN establish a defense. It makes sense, if you are a defense attorney, why would you bring up a defense before the plaintiff made out a claim?
5) Bad things happen to good people. And sometimes no one is responsible. It’s so tempting to think that everything that goes wrong is automatically a tort. It isn’t. Not every car accident is a result of negligence. You need to meet all elements of the tort, and sometimes an accident does not meet the requirements of negligence.
6) Negligence, negligence, negligence. This will most likely be heavily tested. Remember that to prove a claim of negligence, the defendant has to have a duty (usually you can put in “duty to be a reasonable…whatever it is that they’re doing”), they have to breach that duty (remember, no breach, no negligence!), that breach has to cause an injury (both the actual and proximate cause) and there has to be an injury.
7) Strict liability is rare! It only occurs in 3 ways – wild animals, products, ultra hazardous activities.
On top of all of that, just remember to always explain WHY. This is the most important part of any exam; do not just restate rules, but explain why those rules are applicable to the current fact pattern.
GOOD LUCK!
Thursday, October 29, 2009
So You Failed The Bar?
But then stop. And realize this is not the worst thing that could ever happen to you. And realize that there are PLENTY of people in the same boat as you, and ALL of you will do just fine.
I know this because most of the students that come to me for private tutoring are repeat takers. And those students end up passing the bar. And they end up getting jobs, and then no one cares that they failed, or how many times they failed. You just have to pull yourself up by your boot straps, realize that you need to do something differently, and try again. I had a student take the bar 13 times, come to me for the 14th, and finally pass. Talk about dedication! If he can tough it out, so can you!
So, why did you fail and what can you do differently?
1) Didn’t put in enough time. This is rarely why students fail. Trust me. Most of my students put in PLENTY of time the first time, and I’m sure you did as well. But, on the off chance that you feel you just didn’t work hard enough, work a bit harder next time. (but please trust me when I say this is RARELY the case).
2) Did not study effectively. You might have put in HOURS and HOURS and HOURS in the library, on your couch, and everywhere else, but perhaps you were doing the wrong thing. I had a student who literally spent 12 hours a day in the library reviewing outlines her first time. Didn’t pass. Why? She was JUST reviewing outlines. Nothing else. This is not effective studying. You need to be doing something active, and merely reviewing outlines time and time again won’t cut it.
3) Your bar review didn’t work for you. Everyone learns differently. There is no “right” way to learn, and thus, no one size fits all bar review. Maybe you need more hands on, one on one help. Maybe you need live lectures instead of a video, or vice versa – maybe you need a video or dvd you can rewind. Maybe you need to spend more time doing questions and less time listening to lectures.
Those are the common themes I see, and most often it’s #2 and #3 that are the problem. How to change?
1) Capitalize on what has worked for you in the past. No, that doesn’t mean that studying for the bar exam is exactly the same as studying in law school. But you know yourself well enough to know what works.
2) Find our how you study best. Are you a visual learner? Audio? Do you need to draw lots of charts and graphs? Figure this out and then run with it. If you’re not sure, then seek out a private tutor (they can also help you figuring out where you went wrong – one read of my student’s essays, and I can figure out how to direct them)
3) Most importantly – DO SOMETHING DIFFERENTLY. The definition of insanity is repeating the same behavior and expecting different results. No one needs insane lawyers, so do something different! Shake it up – find a new bar review, find a tutor, find a new place to study, find new books, try to do more practice questions and less reviewing of your outline.
Whatever you decide, the important thing is to not give up. You can and will succeed.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
How To Study For Exams
So, in the Halloween spirit (because it’s my favorite holiday), I’ve decided to give you some treats. Now, while I can’t give candy over the internet, I’ll give you study tips instead.
1. Use old exams from your professors. Most professors have these available either online, or through your library. If they are not available, talk to your professor, ask if you can practice with old exams. There might be a good reason why he or she hasn’t made them available, or, perhaps it slipped their mind and your request may impress them! Either way, this is the best way to prepare for your exams. First and foremost, you need to practice your writing. Secondly, using your professor’s old exams will give you a good idea of how they write fact patterns and what they are looking for.
2. Use your professors. Go talk to them. Ask for feedback. It is their job. If they were kind enough to give you a midterm or any practice exams, pay attention to the feedback and even ask them to expand. I give my students practice essays before the actual exam, and I always give a great deal of feedback. If your professor does this, thank them and take it seriously. Visit them during their office hours and ask how you can improve. If they don’t give you midterms or practice exams, write something on your own and ask for feedback. They are your best resource, so use them!
3. Do not listen to classmates. They might mean well, they might not. Either way, everyone is different, and they don’t necessarily know anymore than you. Just because the guy that sits next to you in Torts spends 12 hours in the library doesn’t mean that will work for you. Everyone has different learning styles, so don’t try to mimic someone else.
4. Practice makes perfect. Just like I said in 1, practicing your writing is the best way to prepare. Reviewing outlines and notes will only get you so far. If your professor doesn’t have old exams, find something like LawTutor’s Big Pictures, Little Essays or Examples and Explanations. These are books that have sample hypotheticals and sample answers.
5. Learn to apply facts. Learning the law is only the first step. Applying it is the most important step. Take the books I mentioned in 4, or make up fact patterns with your study group, and practice your analysis. The more you do this, the easier I gets. When I was taking constitutional law, I used to meet with my professor and run different fact patterns with her. Not only was it actually fun, but it helped me fine tune my skills. This is what a lawyer does; a client comes in, and gives you facts. You need to then apply those facts to the law. This is also what you need to do on exams.
So, Happy Halloween, and Happy Studying!
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Vicarious Liability; what it is, what it isn’t
So, here is the nitty gritty on vicarious liability.
Basically, if vicarious liability applies, that means you are responsible for the torts of someone else. You do not have to be negligent in any way, you’re just on the hook. Think of what the term “vicarious” means outside of law school; when you say “oh, I want to live vicariously through you”, you mean you want to sit back and live that persons’ life, or reap the benefits, without doing anything. Same for vicarious liability – you get to sit back and be liable without doing anything.
So, how is this fair? Well, we only apply vicarious liability to certain relationships; the most common being employer/employee or agency relationships. For one to be vicariously liable for the torts of their employee, the person must 1) be an employee (do not forget to analyze this element. If they flat out tell you the tortfeasor is an employee, fine, no analysis needed, but otherwise in an exam you should show why the tortfeasor is an employee, not an independent contractor, since vicarious liability does NOT apply to independent contractors) and 2) acting within the scope of their employment. For an agency relationship it’s much the same; 1) is the tortfeasor an agent, 2) acting to benefit the principal.
That’s all you need. The employer or principal does NOT, let me repeat that again, does NOT need to be negligent in any way. Do not confuse this with negligent hiring or failure to supervise.
So, what does it mean to be “acting within the scope of your employment/agency?” Well, essentially, is the tortfeasor’s actions going to benefit the employer or agent? For instance, (ex 1) if I send my assistant to get me fountain soda down the street (I do this quite often as I have an unhealthy addiction to 32oz glasses of sugar) and he takes my car and hits someone, he was acting within the scope of his employment, since he was acting to benefit me. (Really, I’m not a good lawyer, professor OR tutor without that sugary caffeine). That means that I, as the employer (or more precisely, LawTutors, LLC) is responsible for his negligence. If you notice, the company did not do anything. LawTutors did not tell him to drive recklessly, nor was LawTutors in the car with him. But my assistant WAS acting within the scope of his employment, so by default, the employer (me or LawTutors) is vicariously liable.
Some people will tell you that vicarious liability only applies to negligence. This is not true. It is just true that it more commonly applies to negligence. This is because it is rare that an intentional tort is within the scope of someone’s employment. For example; (ex 2), what if you are on a plane, and the flight attendant comes by your seat, and not liking your wardrobe choice for the day, punches you? You would not be pleased. In fact, your first inclination might be to sue the airline. Well, the flight attendant is most definitely an employee, but was he or she acting within the scope of their employment? Certainly not. I would find it hard to believe that the flight attendant punched you to further the goals of the airline. If they did, the airline has really strange customer service, even for an airline. So, there is no vicarious liability in this example.
However, (ex 3) what if you are at a bar, (I know, law students are too busy studying for that, but go with me on this hypo…..) and the bouncer roughly “bounces” you, committing a battery. Is the bar vicariously liable? Well sure! The bouncer is an employee, and “bounced” you roughly to benefit the bar. That’s essentially what a bouncer does, so unlike the flight attendant example, the bouncer WAS acting within the scope of his employment. What if the bar specifically said “when bouncing people, don’t be too rough”? Well, the bar is STILL vicariously liable because you can not, as an employer, simply avoid vicarious liability because you tell someone NOT to commit a tort.
Now, going back to example 1. There is most certainly vicarious liability, but could there be other kinds of liability on the part of me or LawTutors? Potentially! What if I knew my assistant was an awful driver. I knew he got into accidents at least twice a year, that he never looked where he was going, constantly disobeyed traffic signs, and to top it all off, was constantly texting while driving. And I was perfectly aware of all of this when I handed him my keys. Now, not only am I vicariously liable (as discussed above) but I may also be liable for my OWN negligence; for giving car keys to someone I knew was an awful driver. This is the most important distinction to make – they are SEPARTE torts. DO NOT, under any circumstances, combine the two. I see students analyze vicarious liability all the time in a hypo similar to example 1 by saying “LawTutors is vicariously liable for assistant’s actions because he was an employee and they gave him the keys knowing he was a bad driver”. NO NO NO. TWO SEPARATE torts. DIFFERENT torts. Hammer that in now, and repeat with me- SEPARATE TORTS.
Let’s do another. In example 3 with the bouncer, we have already established that the bar would be vicariously liable since the bouncer was acting within the scope of his employment. Now, let’s add to the facts. What if the bar knew the bouncer had a history of violence? The bouncer’s background check revealed that he had been in and out of jail on several occasions for assault and battery, and was even ordered to take anger management classes. If that’s the case, perhaps the bar might also be liable for negligent hiring; which is DIFFERENT from vicarious liability. With me so far? Seeing how they are separate torts?
Last one – back to example 2. We established that the airline would not be vicariously liable (unless, in some strange customer relations fail, the airline decided to make it part of their policy to punch poorly dressed passengers as a way to get their flights looking a bit better), but does that mean the poor passenger is without a claim against the airline? Not at all. Perhaps there would be a negligence claim against the airline for failure to supervisor the flight attendant, or failure to properly train the flight attendant on how to deal with passengers, or maybe, if, like the bouncer, the flight attendant had a history of violence, perhaps a negligent hiring claim. But the important thing to remember is that none of these is vicarious liability.
So, remember ONE thing when analyzing vicarious liability. The plaintiff only need establish that the tortfeasor was an employee, acting within the scope of his or her employment, and then the employer is AUTOMATICALLY liable. It should also be noted that this does not let the tortfeasor off the hook, they are ALSO liable. So don’t go committing torts at work thinking you won’t be responsible.
I hope that helped clear up any vicarious liability confusion. Even if your first year does not test it often, it comes up on the bar exam ALL the time, so it’s a good idea to master it now!
Thursday, October 8, 2009
MIDTERM SPECIAL
For a limited time only, you can purchase “Big Pictures, Little Essays” AND the “Big Picture Cds” for ONLY $49.95. This is normally a $99.95 value, and the first time LawTutor’s materials have been half off!
If LawTutors is tabling at your school, you can make this purchase at the table. Or you can call the office at 617-738-4800, or email us at info@lawtutors.net. If you need the materials shipped, there will be a $10 shipping and handling charge.
In addition, we are running a midterm special on One on One Tutoring:
If you purchase a one on one tutoring package between now and November 6th, you will get extra hours!
If you purchase a 10 hour package, you will receive 2 hours for free. If you purchase a 20 hour package, you will receive 5 hours for free. The package will not expire for a year, so if you purchase 20 hours now, you will have a year to spread out those 25 hours. That’s why it’s such a great deal to get the extra free hours now!
In addition, the materials fee for first time students will be $99.95 instead of the normal $150. Again, the first time the materials have been on sale, so take advantage now!
Friday, October 2, 2009
MPRE SEMINAR DATE CHANGE
Friday, September 25, 2009
MPRE Tips
The MPRE, as you know, addresses areas of judicial canons and the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility, but it also revisits Torts? What? No one ever told me
torts was on the exam?! Okay, maybe not the whole gamet of torts, but
one particular area tested is negligence...
Consider the following fact pattern:
Prissy was injured in automobile accident by Dolly Drunk and hires attorney to litigate against Dolly Drunk. Prissy informs attorney that she is unwilling to accept less than $150,000.00 prior to trial and if the matter goes to trial she would want no less than $200,000.00 A week before trial Dolly's counsel offers to settle case for
$160,000.00 in exchange for a release and dismissal of Prissy's pending action against Dolly. Attorney rejects the offer. The matter goes before a jury, and the jury returns a verdict of $300,000.00. Prissy later learns that the offer of settlement was never communicated to her by attorney. Infuriated, Prissy brings suit alleging civil malpractice liability.
Did attorney's actions subject her to malpractice liability?
There are several options that the Examiners could provide as possible selections in a multiple choice set up. One's initial gut response is Yes,.... because one may remember reading Rule 1.2 which pertains to this question in pertinent part that the “...lawyer shall abide by the decisions concerning the objectives of representation and, as a result required by Rule 1.4. Rule 1.4 which further states that [a] lawyer shall (1) promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client's informed consent, as defined in Rule 1.0(e), is required by these
Rules; (2) reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished; and (3) keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter.
In the above fact pattern, it is safe to say that the attorney did none of that. But, the answer is No, the attorney will not be subject to liability. How can that be? Look at the call of the question. The call of the question is asking whether the attorney is subject to liability. Liability should alert you to the fact that this is a civil claim, most likely based on negligence (legal malpractice) and negligence is premised on four elements (in the context of negligence actions) Duty; Breach; Causation; and Harm/Damages. Assuming Prissy could prove the first three elements, she cannot prove damages. Recall in the fact pattern that the jury awarded he $300,000.00. Therefore, Prissy was not damaged.
How might the result of this question been different if the call of the question was is Prissy subject to discipline? The attorney most certainly WOULD have been subject to discipline.
For more advice on taking the MPRE, please contact LawTutors to learn more about their MPRE seminar, or working with Joe Keeney, the MPRE Attorney Instructor. (www.lawtutors.net, 617-738-4800)
Thursday, September 17, 2009
The Trials Of Law School - a movie review
The documentary, by Porter Heath Morgan, follows 8 students as they embark on their first year at The University of Oklahoma Law School. My first criticism is that not every law school is The University of Oklahoma, and every law school gives a slightly different experience; due to the faculty, the culture or the geography. For instance, it was said that classes consist of 40-45 students. This is starkly different from most law school, where a first year class typically consists of 150 students. Having said that, Mr. Morgan fills this gap by including interviews with faculty and administration from various law schools around the country. In addition, despite the fact that not every law school will not be identical to The University of Oklahoma, the film does a good job of capturing the typical experience that every first year shares.
First off, the good: The mix of students Mr. Morgan chose was excellent. They are of different age ranges and different backgrounds, all having different responsibilities and concerns outside of law school.
As stated above, Mr. Morgan included interviews with faculty and administration from all over. To be honest, this was my favorite part of the documentary, and I felt it was the most helpful for potential students. I was also impressed with the individuals that Mr. Morgan chose to include, since many of them, like Rich Freer and Eric Posner, are renowned in the legal field. I also found myself nodding in agreement with many of the interviews, since they were highlighting points that, as a professor myself, I am consistently stressing to my students. Many first year students currently going through the process, as well as incoming students, can benefit greatly from a lot of the advice doled out.
I found that the movie really captured the “essence” of law school, and the stress involved. I also loved the parts about finals, since again, it really captured what it is like to go through the stress of law school finals, which are nothing like anyone has ever been through before law school. I also loved a comment about law school being like high school, which, for good and bad, is completely on point!
It was also great how Mr. Morgan wrapped things up at the end, with the ability to show people that there IS life after your first year, and those first exams are NOT life or death. You can move on, you really really can!
I also found the bonus feature “Think Like A Lawyer”, is an incredibly bonus for current first years!
Now, for the not so good: I often found the narrative a bit choppy. It was really difficult to get invested in the lives of these students. I was also disappointed that Mr. Morgan did not dive as deep as I would have hoped into certain areas. For instance, some of the students were parents, and some were dating others in their group, and these would have been very interesting areas to dig just a bit deeper into, however, the viewer was only given a taste. So many of my students are “non traditional”, in that they have to balance families and, sometimes, full time jobs. I was so happy that Mr. Morgan included students that face those same challenges, however, so disappointed that we did not see more of how they balanced those responsibilities.
There were also some parts that I found did not make sense, or were just not relevant, like a student getting ready in the morning. I felt that time could have been better used to flesh out some of the other things that were only touched upon.
My only major issue, especially from the standpoint of a professor, is that there was a scene where one of the students contradicted the professor, and the movie never took the focus back to why she MIGHT be wrong, and the professor might be right. She was using real life experiences, and it would have been a PERFECT opportunity for Mr Morgan to discuss with professors about how students that come in with too much work experiences are often at a disadvantage, since they think they know things they do not. Many of my students work while in law school, or have had previous work experience. Even if that work experience is in the field of law, it does not always mean what they learned on the job was correct.
Again, overall I really enjoyed it, and felt it captured the essence of what it means to struggle through your first year of law school. I think this is a must see for anyone contemplating applying for law school, or, for that matter, any current first years!
Monday, September 14, 2009
Torts Tips
1. ALWAYS establish a prima facie case before a defense. If you think about this, it just makes good sense. If the plaintiff's attorney has not established that your client committed battery, why would you bring up self defense? Just as the plaintiff needs to establish a prima facie case to bring a claim, so do you!
2. Remember that bad things happen to good people, and it's not always a tort. Even though we, as a society, as pretty litigious, you can't sue over EVERYTHING.
3. Remember that when establishing negligence, you need DUTY, BREACH, CAUSATION, INJURY. ALL of them. Don't skimp and fail to discuss one of the necesarry elements.
4. Remember that a battery doesn't always have to be HARMFUL. It can be offensive. Harmful OR offensive contact.
5. An assault is an intent to cause imminent apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact. Keep in mind that apprehension is NOT the same as fear.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Get Paid for ACTUALLY Graded Bar Exam Essays
If any of your essays are accepted, you will be paid $250 per accepted essay.
Please email info@lawtutors.net or call 617-738-4800 for more information
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Why Law School Is Different Than Undergrad
1) Social networking sites: while it feels like junior high, law school is actually a lot more adult than undergrad. You don’t have to become completely responsible and button down, but keep your facebook and myspace profiles clean. Be aware that future colleagues and future bosses could potentially be reading your profile; be careful of drinking pictures, and updates that are too personal. Also, take measures to beef up your security on those sites, and keep them private! Also, be careful of who you friend. Again, I’m not going to tell you not to live your life, and not to be yourself, just be a bit careful!
2) Fellow Students: these fellow students will eventually be fellow colleagues. Make friends, not enemies. No, you’re not going to like everyone, and not everyone has to be invited to your wedding, but it doesn’t hurt to be nice. These are people that you are going to have to work with, and you might need favors from them. The legal community is small, no matter where you are, so learn to be civil. You want to be remembered for your professionalism, not for stepping on other people’s toes or being unpleasant.
3) Study Habits: what made you successful in college most likely wont work in law school. You might have to learn to study a bit differently, so do not assume you can rely on your old habits. I’m willing to bet that many of you were very successful in undergrad with minimal effort and relied on attending class to teach you what you needed to know. Remember that in law school you are among the cream of the crop, so you have to work even HARDER just to stay on track. Merely showing up in class, and doing the minimal reading will not get you where you need to be. Law school requires doing the reading assigned BEFORE class, showing up for class, and THEN studying some more, making sure that you understand and can apply the material.
4) Exams: most undergrad classes were based on multiple choice tests, not so in law school. Most law school classes have a grade based almost 100% on your final. That’s a lot of pressure on one little test! This means that during the semester you can’t slack, because cramming at the end of the semester like you’ve done for finals in the past will absolutely not work. Also, bear in mind law school exams ask for an analysis, not merely reciting laws that you have learned. Therefore, mere memorization of buzz words will not get you by, you need to make sure you have as complete of an understanding as possible of the concepts and reasoning behind the law as much as the rule itself.
5) Majors: In undergrad it is important to pick a major as soon as possible and stick to your concentration. In law school it is a little bit different. Sure, it is important to think about an area that you want to specialize in, but it is just as important to try to broaden your horizons. Save room for dessert, take a course because it sounds interesting. Law school is more about learning how to analyze and interpret the law and apply it to the facts rather than memorizing and retaining the substance of any particular class. You never know what area of the law you might fall in love with.
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Take Care of Yourself in Law School
Again, yes, I know, you have no time. When you’re not in class, you need to be studying, or going to those extracurricular activities, I know. However, it will not kill you to take an hour a day to do something for yourself ; jog, watch your favorite tv show, go on a date, go see a movie. You can not become an antisocial hermit. Trust me, you do that, you wont have any friends once you become a lawyer. And lawyers need friends too! You also need friends, and a support system of family, to help you through law school!
Last but certainly not least, eat right! It’s temping to try to subside on pizza alone. It’s tempting, pizza IS my favorite food, but nightly pies will not do your body or mind any good. At least throw some vegetable toppings on them occasionally! I’m not telling you to never indulge, but try to make an effort to maintain some healthy eating, which will make you feel better, AND give you better fuel to study. A great option if you are in the Brookline area, is Boston Pita Pit on Harvard St is a great option to eat healthy and yummy!
Also, continue to go to the doctor or dentist regularly. No one wants an attorney with funky teeth! Not to mention, you will miss more class, AND more study time, if you put things off.
Remember – law school is tough, and it’s a lot of work, but it does not have to consume your ENTIRE life. Bottom line; take care of yourself!
Saturday, August 15, 2009
New Seminar for First Years
The program will teach first year law students how to best spend their study time, how to outline, the pros and cons of study groups and commercial outlines, and how to prepare for and ace an exam!
The seminar will be taught by LawTutor’s President and Vice President, Tania Shah and Melissa Gill, and, like all LawTutor’s, seminars it will be interactive. The seminar will not be a full day of lecture, but rather Melissa and Tania offering advice and then giving you, the incoming law student, an opportunity to put that advice to use and practice and discuss what you just learned.
In addition, Tania and Melissa will be joined by other Attorney Instructors who will be offering advice and sharing stories. LawTutors will also have many of their current third year students and recent graduates on hand, so that incoming law students may ask questions and get to know law school from a student perspective, to help you along, and to network.
The program will take place on September 26th, from 10am to 5:15pm. Lunch and materials will be provided. Materials include “Strategies and Tactics for the First year,” “Law School In a Box,” “LawTutors’ Big Pictures, Little Essays,” “LawTutor’s Big Picture CDs,” as well as practice exams, outlines and charts that you will go over during the seminar.
The fee is $295, which includes the seminar, lunch and all materials.
Please contact the office at 617-738-4800 or email us at info@lawtutors.net to sign up or for more information.
See LawTutor's website for a detailed schedule and more information
Monday, August 10, 2009
Words you should know…BEFORE law school
Case Book: Essentially, your text books. They will not read like a typical text book you had in undergrad or high school, but instead, a case book is a collection of cases, with very little in between.
Case Brief: Your first year of law school you will be reading a ton of cases, and a brief is something you use to summarize those cases. It contains important information about the facts of the case, the holding, and the reasoning behind the holding. Essentially everything you need from the case, so you don’t have to re-read it before finals. Also, it is important to note that there is no ONE “right” way to brief a case, it depends on you, how you learn, and what your professor wants you to get from a case. A bit more in depth on case briefing.
Black Letter Law: These are, in short, the rules you are going to be using. Law school is all about teaching you how to read and interpret cases, and what they mean. The black letter law is what you want to start with. For example, what IS a contract. Or, how does one define battery?
Outlines: This is what you use to condense everything you learned in the past semester. Just like with a case brief, there is no ONE right way to outline, it depends on your learning style, and sometimes the structure of the class. At the end of the semester, your outline is what you want to use to study for your finals. An article on outlining.
Supplements: You will probably hear a lot of classmates talk about supplements. Or upperclassman. They are study aids that help you navigate your casebooks, and often define the black letter law when your casebook fails to do so. Examples and Explanations, published by Aspen, is one such supplement.
IRAC: You will be hearing a lot of about this, and no, it’s not the country. Sometimes it will be referred to as CREAC as well. Simply put, this is how most law professors want you to write your exams, and it stands for “Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion”. More in depth on IRAC.
Tort: A tort is a civil wrong. It is also one of the first classes you will take in law school, except very few people will tell you what a tort is. They sort of just expect you to know it’s not a sweet pastry! You may also be asking, “well, what is a civil wrong”, and the answer to that, in short, is those things that personal injury attorneys sue people over. You have all seen the commercials about slip and fall accidents, well, THAT, my friend, is a tort.
If you keep hearing a word in law school that is not on this list, do not be afraid to either look it up (Black’s Law Dictionary is great!), ask a professor, or ask me! There is no such thing as a stupid question, and do not assume that everyone around you knows what everything means. They are probably just as lost as you are!
Thursday, August 6, 2009
What Should I Do Before Law School
First and foremost, enjoy your remaining down time. Take the next few weeks to spend time with family and friends, and just generally get your life in order. You don’t want outside stress to come in, as much as you can help it, since law school itself is stressful enough.
Second, try to familiarize yourself with how to read and brief a case before the stress of class sets in. Many of your law schools might have an orientation program that focuses on this, and LawTutors, LLC has a “pre law program” that teaches you what to expect with your classes, as well as how to brief and read cases. I've also written a previous article on how to prepare for classes.
Becoming familiar with the layout of cases makes the reading less daunting when classes finally arrive. You may be thinking that you’ve made it into law school, so obviously you know how to read. This is true, but keep in mind that a case book looks nothing like a text book. And, in most law schools, no one tells you what you should be taking away from reading a case. The more practice you have, the easier it becomes, so take any free time in August to try your hand at a few. That way, they won't seem so strange when classes begin.
Before I started law school, I also glanced through a few Examples and Explanations, which is now my favorite supplement; I recommend them to all of my students. They allowed me to learn some very basic black letter law so that reading cases was not as daunting or confusing. It is important to note that your case books will not teach you black letter law, which is why books like E&E are very helpful.
Also, don’t be afraid to ask questions, you don’t want to go your entire semester without knowing what an outline is, or what it means to “brief”. Don’t be afraid to go to upper classman, professors or advisors. Also, a great book to read in August is Law School Confidential. It was a favorite of mine, and helped clear up a lot of confusion.
I also recommend Guerrila Tactics for Getting The Legal Job Of Your Dreams. Yes, it focuses on careers, but also imparts a lot of helpful hints on things you can do during your first year to help yo land that ideal firs job!
Also, don’t be afraid to go to professors with questions! As a professor myself, I consider part of my job to be answering student’s questions, and get very bored during my office hours if no one comes to visit. We don’t want our students getting confused or falling behind, so don’t be afraid to visit us! Many first years are terrified to visit during office hours, and I assure you, we don't bite!
Lastly, get to know the city you are in, find a good place to study, know your route to and from law school, find good places to eat, find a good gym, all that stuff that will make life so much easier when law school starts.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
NEW PRE LAW SEMINAR
The program will teach incoming law students what to expect in law school, how to prepare for classes, what to expect out of classes, how best to spend your study time, how to outline, the pros and cons of study groups and commercial outlines, and how to prepare and ace an exam!
The seminar will be taught by LawTutor’s president and vice president, Tania Shah and Melissa Gill, and like all LawTutor’s seminars will be interactive. The seminar will not be full days of lecture, but rather Melissa and Tania offering advice and then giving you, the incoming law student, and opportunity to put that advice to use and practice and discuss what you just learned.
In addition, Tania and Melissa will be joined by other Attorney Instructors who will be offering advice and sharing stories. LawTutors will also have many of their current third year students and recent graduates on hand, so that incoming law students may ask questions and get to know law school from a student perspective, and to help you along.
The program will take place on August 15th and 16th, from 10am to 4pm each day. Lunch and materials will be provided. Materials include “Stratgies and Tactices for the First year”, “Law School In a Box”, “LawTutors’ Big Pictures, Little Essays”, “LawTutor’s Big Picture Cds” , as well as practice exams, outlines and charts that you will go over during the seminar. The fee is $495, which includes both days of seminar, lunch and all materials.
Check back soon on www.lawtutors.net for a more detailed schedule of the seminar.
To sign up please email Tania (Tania.shah@lawtutors.net) or Melissa (Melissa.gill@lawtutors.net) or call the office at 617-738-4800 and ask to speak to Samantha, Tania or Melissa. Space is limited so sign up soon!
Monday, July 6, 2009
Wait...What? Or How To Effectively Memorize!
I often stress that memorization is not the key to succeeding on the bar exam, and I still stand by that. You need to know the law, and ANALYZE it, in order to pass. However, there are still some things you need to memorize. Memorizing rules of law is not easy for everyone, but sometimes it’s necessary. Hopefully I can impart some memorization tips!
1. Understand the things you memorize: First and foremost, strive to understand the things you need to memorize. Not only will you remember things with greater ease when you fully understand what you are memorizing, but you can not analyze something (remember, the most important part!) until you understand it!
2. Memorize in short time bursts: Plan your memorization time in short bursts of 5 or 10 minutes. Perhaps take some time out to memorize in between MBE questions, or in between practice essays. Bust out your flashcards in line at Starbucks. Sure, people will give you funny looks, but you won’t care after you pass! If you spend too long trying to memorize something, your brain just shuts down and you cease to be effective. No point in studying if you’re not being effective!
3. Memorize in short material bursts: See, your brain tends to remember the first and last things it takes in. If you shorten the amount of information you are taking in, it’s more likely to “stick”. This means pick one subject, and even one subtopic, to memorize at a time. For instance, you know you need to memorize the scrutinies for constitutional law. Start with strict scrutiny, and know that you will memorize JUST that first, and save the other scrutinies for the next memorization session. This tip goes well with the short time bursts; pick one scrutiny per commercial break!
4. Be vocal: Teach rules of law to your significant other, your roommate, your mom or your cat. Trust me, your cat needs to know what all the hearsay exceptions are, and will thank you later. Vocalizing something, even if you are just talking to yourself, helps with memorization.
Employing these techniques will not only help you spend your time memorizing effectively, but will also help you with your analysis. Good Luck!
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
How to Study Effectively for the Bar Exam
Ok, to be fair, even studying effectively you probably are still living the hermit life. That’s ok, it’s only 5 more weeks. Say it with me, 5 more weeks – you can do this! Trust me. Would I lie to you?
Clearly, studying for the bar exam is not the most fun thing you can imagine doing. Though, if doing MBE questions just for kicks is your idea of a good time….who am I to judge? For those of you that don’t get your kicks from MBE questions, since I can’t make the studying more fun, at least I can tell you how to make it more effective.
Essays: Practice your essays with your notes, looking up rules of law. I know, this sounds like cheating, but I’m not suggesting you do it ON the day of the exam, I’m suggesting you do it during practice. Also, the bar exam is actually testing your ability to analyze, and looking up rules in your outline will not help you there. But, it WILL help you learn the correct rules, which is the first step. Plus, it is more effective then trying to memorize rules by reading outlines again and again, or even flashcards for that matter. If you look up rules as you write, you are actively applying facts to those rules, and practicing your writing, in addition to learning the rules, since you are copying them down. This is all active learning; the doing rather than just passively reading. When given the choice, active learning is always more effective.
Also, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE write out your practice essays. Thinking about them in your head, or just drafting outlines, will not help you. You’ve heard practice makes perfect? It’s a cliché for a reason, and now is the time to put that cliché to the test. Write out as many essays as you can in the next 5 weeks. Using your notes, of course.
MBE: As with the essays, you want to be actively learning from the MBE practice questions. If you do not learn from every MBE question you do, you are wasting your time, and just doing that MBE question for fun. As I said before, I won’t judge….but the general feeling is that MOST people have other things they like to do in their spare time. How does one learn from doing an MBE question? Do one at a time, check the answer, and then figure out what you did wrong.
You might have went wrong on substance; forgetting some element of the rule, or just being confused on the black letter law. In that case, now is the time to review our outlines/flashcards/charts, to brush up on the black letter law.
You might have had a reading comprehension problem, reading the call of the question or a certain fact the incorrect way. If that’s the case, take a mental note and be sure to read a bit more carefully in the future. Having said that, make sure you are consistently paying attention to the call of the question; variations such as “which is the least likely outcome” often throw students off course if they are not paying attention.
Perhaps you were torn between A and C, and don’t quite understand why C is the better answer, since they both seem ok to you. In that instance, read the explanation in the back of the book, re-read the question, consult with a tutor, do what you need to do to assess why one answer was the “best” out of all options. Sometimes the way to do this is to figure out why the other three options are incorrect. Remember an answer has to be both factually and legally correct, and never only a little bit legally correct.
What all of these things boil down to is learning from your mistakes, something your mother has been telling you to do since you were just a wee thing. The types of questions asked, as well as the rules tested, are often repeated, which means you are likely to see them again and again – so what better way to master them then to learn from each question? Remember merely tallying your score and shrugging, moving on to review an outline without knowing where your weaknesses are, will not help improve your score. You have to know where you went wrong. You have to learn FROM the questions, and I can not stress that enough.
Having taken this all into consideration, perhaps you might have time, after studying EFFECTIVELY, to actually see your friends in the next 5 weeks. But only once or twice :)
Thursday, May 7, 2009
How to Study for a Dual Bar Exam
(Sheri is one of LawTutor's Attorney Instructors)
You’ve just completed your last law school exam…. EVER, and you are about to give a sigh of relief when you realize – it’s not over yet! That’s right, in a few short months, you will take that exam you have been dreading for the last three years – THE BAR EXAM.
By now, you have probably given the bar some thought. Maybe you’ve even started the application process. Of course, the first question all students must ask themselves – Which state bar exam should I take? For some, the decision is easy. For others, it forces some major life decisions because the decision rests on where you plan to practice – and live!
Suddenly, you start to hear some rumors about fellow classmates that are taking the bar in two states – they must be crazy, right? Isn’t that double the work?
Not at all! Here’s why. First, your MBE score is applied to both states, so you only need to study for and take that portion once. Second, while you need to study state specific law for both states for the essay sections, chances are, you will be learning essay structures and strategies that can be applied successfully in both states.
Whether or not you take two bars is a decision you have to make. One bar is often stressful enough, and adding on the stress of another state bar can feel overwhelming. However, many law graduates have taken dual bars and have been successful. Here are some tips that may help you if you decide to take a dual bar:
1. Decide which two states you would like to sit for. Seems obvious, right? However, whether or not you can take a dual bar will depend on the states you wish to sit for. The state essay section will need to fall on different days (the day before the MBE or the day after the MBE). For example, many law graduates will take New York and Massachusetts during the same bar exam since the state essay days are not on the same day. The same would not work for Connecticut and Massachusetts since the state essay section falls on the same day. Look into the two states you want to take to determine if it is doable. Keep in mind that you will need to be in the actual state for the essay sections, so travel and lodging will be an important factor to keep in mind.
2. Understand the application process for both states, and their requirements for sitting for a dual bar. Once you determine that you can take both bars, you need to fill out applications for both bar exams, indicating on both applications that you will be taking a dual bar (usually, it will ask you in the application). This also means different bar application requirements and different deadlines. Be sure to check the requirements and deadlines for both bars.
3. Determine which you will sit for the MBE section of the bar and let both states know in your application. Again, it is important for you to understand the requirements for each state – some states will require you to sit in a certain jurisdiction when you are taking a dual bar. For example, if you are taking New York and Massachusetts, you will need to indicate to New York that you plan to sit in New York for the MBE section (and let MA know that you will be sitting in NY for the MBE section of the bar). Failure to do this may mean that you are not on the list to get into the exam, so be sure that your applications match.
4. Make sure you transfer your MBE scores to the other state. Since you will be sitting physically in one state for the MBE, this means that the other state will not have you’re your MBE score immediately on hand. You will need to transfer your score to that state. Again, check the state’s procedure’s in regards to transferring the MBE score – you want to be sure that both states have it to grade your exam!
5. Determine which bar you must pass, and which bar you would like to pass. Of course, you want to pass both bars; otherwise, you wouldn’t bother to take them both. However, it is important to keep things in perspective. If you know what state you plan to practice in, that state bar should take priority. If you are taking a commercial bar course, you should choose the course for that state. Sometimes, law graduates will choose the state’s priority based on the state bar’s reputation of having a low pass rate. Keep in mind, this should be one factor you consider, and should not be a determinative factor. It is more important for you to pass the bar in the state you plan to practice law.
6. Be sure to understand the structure of the both bar exams, and get examples of actual answers to the state’s essay questions. Different states have different structures for the bar exam. What is the minimum to pass the bar? What does the state essay section consist of? For example, New York’s state essay section consists of NY specific multiple choice questions and a MPT on the essay day of the exam. On the other hand, Massachusetts’ state essay section consists of ten essays. NY does not have a page limit for writing essays, whereas MA gives you four pages to write your essay. See if you can get examples of actual bar essays for both state exams (New York posts these on their Bar Exam website). What does each state consider a “well-written” essay? Understanding the structure for both exams will lower the anxiety since you will know what to expect.
7. Determine what subjects are tested on each bar. Again, different states may test different subjects. While most states overlap what is tested, it is important to know the areas you will need to study.
8. Practice writing essays for both states. Regardless of which state bar you are taking, a well-written essay is crucial to pass a bar exam. Under the bar time restraints and pressure, it is easy to freeze up when trying to answer a question. Practice writing many essays from both bars, and if you do not have a tutor, re-read and analyze them. Did you outline prior to writing? Is the essay well-structured? Be sure that your answer analyzes the question asked. Look at each sentence and ask yourself the purpose of that sentence; Is this is legal conclusion (if so, did I properly analyze how I got to that conclusion?); Is this a statement of fact? Is this a statement of law? Did I miss any issues? Try to rework your paragraph so that the bulk of your paragraph contains an analysis.
9. Strengthen your MBE score. Since both bars will use the same MBE score, you want to be sure that your MBE score is strong. Typically (but not always), a passing rate will be the combination of both your MBE score and your essay score for the state (be sure to understand your state’s scoring system). This means a stronger MBE score may balance out weaker essays for your state essay sections – this is especially important for the state you are not focusing on. The best way to strengthen your MBE score is to do multiple MBE questions, and to analyze why you got the answer wrong.
10. Create a study schedule. As if taking one bar isn’t enough, you now have the pressure of two bar exams – MBE laws, state laws, contradicting laws…. How are you going to keep it all straight? The fact is, no matter how much you try, you will probably walk into the bar exam feeling like you don’t know everything or you can’t remember which state law is which. It is important that you have a study plan or schedule to ensure that you focus your time properly. Consider getting a tutor to work on a study plan and to help you with the study process.
11. Talk to other people who have taken (and passed) a dual bar in the states you plan to take. Find out how they managed their time, or other tips that they have about taking both bars.
12. Relax! Easier said than done, but remember, it’s only an exam, and at the end of the day, you can only do your best. You’ve already survived law school, and you will survive this too!
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
I DON’T LIKE THE BAR EXAM, HENCE I DO NOT BELIEVE I SHOULD HAVE TO TAKE IT (and other musings of Bar Examinees).
By Joseph Keeney, Esq
(Joe is one of our LawTutor's Attorney Instructors)
1. I graduated law school with a 3.5 therefore, I shouldn't have to take the bar exam.
Comment: Where to begin with this contention? For starters, there could be a lot of reasons as to why you achieved a 3.5 and more importantly why you have to take this exam. One reason that you achieved a 3.5 could be because you flat out deserved it, and this grade point average is indicative of your skill and work ethic. Too bad you still have to take the thing. Another reason that you achieved a 3.5 is because the curriculum and your class schedule was soft. Another reason that you achieved a 3.5 is because the academic semester was more conducive to your preferences ie., work schedule, or finances. Who knows? But for now, this standardized approach of the MBE taken with essay writing is the best option on the board (no pun intended) until mind reading and ethical fortune-telling are made available.
2. I practiced 2500 multiple choice questions, took three practice exams, and studied 8 hours a day.
Comment: Yawn. This exam is not about studying hard. This exam is about studying smart. Sure, by doing more multiple choice questions, this may allow the opportunity for your brain to become accustomed to the format style of the questions as well as the various ways in which a fine point of the law can be tested. For that I say, the more the merrier. However, one must be careful in setting large goals as they sometimes do not account for each student's needs. In other words, the student's desire to answer too many questions can easily overshadow the quality of takeaways that one should yield from each question. One LawTutors’ recommendation that addresses the takeaways and which has proven useful is for the student to analyze each possible answer to the degree: "I chose Answer A because….." This is valuable because is regimented reinforcement. Too often, while reviewing assignments with students, we find out that the student's answer selection by letter choice was correct, but the rationale behind it was wrong. With incorrect rationale, the examinee is building false misunderstanding of black letter application.
3. My law school did not require these subjects therefore why should this be on the bar exam?
Comment: Your law school gave you choice. Hence, that is why these choices are called electives. Another angle the bar examiners are testing is your ability to work under pressure and to undertake a vast breadth of material. As words of encouragement, your understanding of the subjects tested on the MBE should pay dividends on the essay portion of the exam.
4. I was on law review/law journal but still received 3's across the board on the essay portion of the bar exam.
Comment: There is certainly little doubt that the selected student for these organizations possesses analytical ability. However, there are a few aspects or commonalities that may make students more susceptible to the format of the bar exam. As you already know, much of what is subject to academic articles can be esoteric or involve much on opinion or can provide as an analytical overview of jurisdictional trends over a particular subject. Also, there is a good chance that what you are writing or analyzing in these activities pertains to an area of the law or subject matter in which the student is interested. In a lot of ways, as the author of this scholarly article you can control the direction and format of what is to be written. The bar exam format is much different. It covers areas of the law that perhaps involve subject matter that you never studied in law school let alone that you are interested. Moreover, successful bar exam writing is often the result of disciplined commitment to the IRAC or CREAC method.
5. Considering I excelled on the LSAT, I had no reason to think otherwise with respect to the bar exam. I have always done well with standardized tests.
Comment: The LSAT, in lot of ways, is used as a prognosticator on how well the candidate will perform in law school. The bar exam, in lot ways, measures how well the candidate for admission to the bar did in law school. That being said, the LSAT's approach is to measure certain cognitive and analytical skills within the environment of a multiple choice question. Is it perfect measurement? Are the results of the LSAT necessarily a dispositive indicator on how one will achieve in law school and ultimately the bar exam? No, of course not, but see # 1 above. Another distinction between the two exams is that the bar exam is measuring more towards what the examinee actually learned over the course of three years and recently in the past eight weeks leading up to the exam.
6. The format for the exam just isn't fair.
Comment: There is obviously much debate and study on fairness interplayed with standardized test taking. Believe it or not, I am not going to make an opinion one way or another. This is reality, and the more excuse-making that goes on is negative energy and interference.
7. My commercial material doesn't exactly mesh with the law school outline that my Professor approved. I am going to defer to my law school outline.
Comment: I would like to make the suggestion that you should choose whichever you prefer. However, this doesn't go without saying a few comments first. Several of the commercial entities out there have either been specializing in bar preparation for decades or are accompanied by an entourage of legal authors, professional test takers, and professors. That being said the commercial outlines are terrific for picking out repeated questions, trends, and proclivities that the Multi-State drafters and Board of Bar Examiners will test. Sometimes I have found it helpful that if there is a particular area that you find yourself disproportionately weak or feel that you require further review that those outlines and hornbooks may be used in a supplementary capacity.
8. Because I have been a law clerk for now three years, that practical experience ought to give me an advantage over the people that have just been going to school.
Comment: Doubtful. Jobs are breeding grounds for misunderstanding and misapplication of black letter. After all, who doesn't plead waiver, estoppel, and laches not knowing the difference. You may need to know these types of distinctions on the bar exam.
9. Well, last time I took it, my MBE score was well above the average so now I am just going to focus on the Essays.
Comment: I dare you to make the mistake.
10. This time I am going to spend a week studying Future Interests.
Comment: One common thread between law school preparation and bar exam preparation often comes down to time management. Why allocate 1 week of eight to a topic that could only amount to 5 percent of the questions on the exam doesn't make a whole lot of sense? This could be more judiciously spent in other areas.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
How to Prepare for the Bar Exam
So, you might be asking, how DOES one prepare for the bar exam? And how does one do so without losing their mind? Or becoming a crazy recluse, cutting off all ties from friends and family, only to appear at some point in August looking very pale, overly caffeinated and bearded. (yes, I’m looking at you too ladies! Who has time for waxing when the bar exam is around the corner?!?!)
First things first, realize this summer will NOT be fun. I don’t say that to scare you, but if you buckle down over the next couple months you will never have to do this again. Secondly, don’t pay attention to what your friends are doing. Everyone has a method that works for them.
Once we’ve gotten that out of the way, there are some things that can make the summer a bit more smooth, and make your chances of passing the bar a bit higher. Practice, for one. Yes, that seems a bit obvious – why wouldn’t you practice? But many students want to spend a ton of time reviewing your outlines, and memorizing black letter law. While you DO need to know the black letter law, simply reviewing it for months will not get you where you need to be. Don’t wait to practice, start right away! Learn from each MBE question you practice, this is key. The MBE won’t ask you to define battery. Instead, they will give you an odd ball fact pattern, and ask you what the plaintiff’s chances of success will hinge on. This means that you need to know MORE than the black letter law, and the only way to do this is to practice more and more MBE questions. Having said that, don’t JUST practice. If you aren’t learning something from EACH MBE question you do, you are wasting your time. I teach bar review, in fact, my whole life centers around the bar exam and even I can find better things to do than MBE questions just for fun.
As for your essays, again, you need to practice. I know, I’m not really coming up with a new rocket science here, you’ve all been told to practice before. However, despite that, so many students fight me on practicing. Use your notes to practice essays – it’s better than writing wrong law! Take your time and practice technique! Don’t start testing yourself right away. The more essays you practice, and not just outline, the easier exam day will be.